Listen to Filip Gregor, Head of Frank Bold’s Responsible Companies section and member of EFRAG’s Sustainability Reporting Board
In this Frankly Speaking episode, we explore how companies should undertake a materiality assessment when they tackle their sustainability report. The concept of materiality is derived from financial accounting in business and human rights, and very simply asks the question: does this information matter?
To guide us, we welcome back Filip Gregor, head of Frank Bold’s Responsible Companies section and member of EFRAG’s Sustainability Reporting Board, which draws up and recommends the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS).
In this episode, you’ll hear more about:
“The most fundamental change is that the EU Sustainability Reporting Standards require companies to apply specific criteria for assessing impacts and specific criteria for assessing financial effects. Those criteria are not opinions of their stakeholders. So when it comes to the impact, those criteria are the same as the criteria for the salient human rights issues, being the severity and likelihood of actual, respectively, potential impacts for the financial relevance, sustainability related risks and opportunities. Those are the criteria of the magnitude of financial effects on the company and the likelihood. That’s the most important one there.“
What do the new revisions to the European Sustainability Reporting Standards actually mean for businesses, and how will they affect the EU's green transition? Listen to EFRAG TEG members Sandra Atler and Signe Lysgaard
.png)
What can traditional Japanese business practice teach us about corporate sustainability? Listen to Akiko Sato, Business and Human Rights Project Officer at the United Nations Development Programme and Special Adviser at the business and human rights NGO Pillar Two
What is the future of sustainable business? Listen to Chris Coulter, CEO of Globescan and Mark Lee, Global Director of Thought Leadership at the SustainAbility Institute by ERM
