home
news

Summary of the Turów case

share this article

Governments turning a blind eye to Illegal lignite mining in Turów: Local communities and the environment suffer.

Damage caused by illegal mining

Cracks in houses, disappearing water in wells, starving cattle, destruction of houses - those are not horrifying views into the future but reality of local communities living next to the immense lignite mine Turów covering an area around 30 square kilometers.

The lignite mine Turów in Poland impacts the environment across borders. In Germany, especially in the Town of Zittau, drainage of groundwater from deep aquifers leads to the lowering of the land surface and cracks in houses. In the Czech Republic, groundwater is disappearing towards Poland and wells become dry. According to the Czech Geological Survey the monitoring boreholes show the lowest numbers in history. In the extraction borehole in Uhelná used for the drinking water for the whole area there is the lowest amount of water in history. In Opolno-Zdroj, a Polish former spa village neighbouring the Turów mine, water disappeared years ago. Now it is waiting for the destruction of half of its houses.

The Czech Republic left locals without protection

The Czech Republic decided to fight against the violation of European law at the Court of Justice of the European Union. The CJEU ordered Poland to cease mining until the case was settled. Poland ignored the court decisions so the CJEU decided to impose a fine to Poland of 500 000 EUR per day. When Poland offered to the Czech Republic an agreement the Czech government accepted money and left locals without powerful protection.

Since the conclusion of the Czech-Polish agreement on 3 February 2022, the Czech government has distanced itself from the problem related to the runoff of Czech water due to the ongoing mining in the Turów lignite mine. By signing the agreement, the Czech government has received EUR 45 million for the construction of emergency infrastructure (drinking water pipes) to some parts of the Liberec region. In return, the Czech Republic withdrew its lawsuit at the CJEU and committed never again to bring a case before the CJEU for breaches of EU rules related to mining at the Turów mine.

Poland withholds information

Under the Agreement, the Czech Republic is to have information on groundwater. This information was requested by the Frank Bold Society on 14 February 2022 and has not yet been received from the Czech Ministry of Environment. The reason for this is now (following the decision of the Ministry of Environment of 6 February 2023) the asserted protection of trade secrets and a copyright protection of the underground barrier. However, according to the Act on the Right to Environmental Information, protection of trade secrets does not apply to information on the environmental impact of an entrepreneur's operational activities. This data could have prevented the granting of a mining permit until 2044, as the Polish Agent stated.

Poland issued mining license without proper environmental impact assessment

In the meantime, the Polish authorities issued a final decision on 30 September 2022 on PGE's report on the environmental impact assessment of the extension of mining. This decision is being successfully in court by environmental organizations and the town of Zittau on the grounds that the report does not adequately describe the impacts of mining on its surroundings. It was annulled by the Polish regional administrative court in March 2024 - if this decision is upheld by the upper court, it could force the mine to cease operations.

In the meantime, on 17 February 2023, the Polish Ministry of Climate and Environment issued a mining permit until 2044. It justified this on the grounds of attractive jobs and improved macroeconomic indicators. In contrast, it completely ignored the loss of EU funds for a just transition of the region. The decision assessed the impact of the mine on water runoff from the Czech territory as „negligible”.

Local people, environmental organizations from the Czech Republic, Poland and Germany are trying to draw the attention of the European Commission to this situation. However, the Commission has not acted and the environmental damage continues. At the same time, more than 4 000 m3 per day keep flowing into the mine.

EU laws that are being violated by Poland are:

    (
)

You may also like these news

Webinar: ESG Due Diligence - Principles and Practical Experience

Due diligence is a precondition for the sustainable activities as defined by the EU Taxonomy and green financing under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation, including green bonds. Particular ESG due diligence requirements will be regulated by the forthcoming Sustainable Corporate Governance Directive. To help companies better understand its scope and to clarify its requirements, Frank Bold is hosting a webinar. It will feature international experts from companies such as Ericsson and outdoor clothing manufacturer Vaude. We invite you to join us on 26 January at 10 am CET.

Big shift in case of Turów mine. The European Commission has proved Czechia right

In mid-December, the European Commission acknowledged a large part of the arguments put forward by the Czechia in an effort to prevent the expansion and continuation of illegal mining at the Turów mine in Poland, that endangers the sources of drinking water for thousands of people in the Liberec region and, according to new studies, has serious impacts on groundwater in Germany as well. Frank Bold's lawyers, who defend the interests of Czech citizens, have long been involved in the case.

Mining in Turów: Seven demands for an agreement with Poland to protect the Czech communities

The Frank Bold Society and the Neighbourhood Association Uhelná called on the Czech government today to be more consistent in its negotiations with Poland over mining at the Turów brown coal mine. According to both organisations, the government did not have enough information or time to prepare an agreement that would truly protect Czech interests. Moreover, the government has acted in a non-transparent manner by failing to inform the public in advance of the terms of the agreement being prepared, which should lead to the withdrawal of the action against Poland at the EU Court of Justice. The organisations have therefore drawn up a document with seven basic demands on which the Czech side should insist.