European poll shows considerable concern about EU ethics.
A majority of people across Europe are concerned about ethics and lobbying in European Union policy-making, and want better regulation of lobbyists, as well as increased transparency of the EU, according to a new opinion poll. [1]
The poll conducted by TNS opinion, and completed by over 6,000 people in six European countries, reveals that three quarters (73%) of respondents are concerned that lobbyists representing the business sector have too much influence on EU decisions. 80% of those surveyed believe there should be mandatory regulation of lobbying to ensure a balanced participation of different interests in decision-making.
The results come at the beginning of the European Year of Citizens, which aims to stimulate dialogue between governments and society, and thereby better engage citizens in debates and decisions that affect them. [2]
Natacha Cingotti from Friends of the Earth Europe said: “The results of this poll should be a wake-up call for European decision-makers. Citizens are clearly asking for compulsory regulation for lobbying. The Parliament should insist that this happens by making the Transparency Register mandatory. This poll also signals that the poor enforcement of the MEP code of conduct negatively affects citizens’ confidence. Strict implementation and monitoring of MEPs’ second jobs are urgently needed to avoid conflicts of interest.” [3]
4 out of 5 people polled (80%) said they feel less confident that an MEP represents the best interests of citizens if they also work for a lobby group or a private company. French respondents (76%) felt the most strongly that MEPs should not be allowed to work for a lobby group or a private company while they are serving as elected representatives.
The survey reflects mounting concerns among the European public about lobbying in Brussels after recent scandals such as that surrounding the resignation of EU Health and Consumer Policy Commissioner John Dalli, which indicated that representatives of the tobacco industry had privileged access to key EU decision-makers. The report which resulted in the resignation has still not been made public. [4]
The poll also reveals a huge demand for greater transparency. 85% of respondents think that full information about Member States’ negotiations should be open to the public. In the context of the response to the financial crisis, 84% of people find it important that full documentation about what the European Central Bank is doing is publicly available; this is currently not the case.
“This survey confirms the findings of the EU Citizens project conducted over the past year, namely that members of the public are hungry for more information about what is happening in Brussels, and specifically that they want to know about decision-making and spending: 86% of respondents found it important that detailed financial reports and evaluations on how EU money is spent by member states is made publicly available,” said Helen Darbishire, executive director of Access Info Europe.
This survey is part of the EU Citizens project, a joint project between the following organisations: Access Info Europe, Aitec, Environmental Law Service, Friends of the Earth Europe, Health Action International, Spinwatch. The opinion poll is supported by Arbeitskammer Europa (AK Europa).
The full survey results, including country-by-country figures, are available at: www.eu-citizens.org and at: www.foeeurope.org/eucitizenspoll
For more information please contact:
In Brussels:
Natacha Cingotti, transparency campaigner at Friends of the Earth Europe, natacha.cingotti@foeeurope.org ; +32-2-893-1023, +32-4-9294-8898
Francesca Gater, communications officer at Friends of the Earth Europe, francesca.gater@foeeurope.org ; +32-2-893-1010, +32-4-8593-0515
In Madrid:
Pamela Bartlett, Access Info, pam@access-info.org , +34 91 356 6558
Notes to editors:
[1] The survey was conducted by TNS opinion in six EU Member States: Austria, Czech Republic, France, the Netherlands, Spain and the UK. Approximately 1,000 surveys were completed online in each country from 17–23 January. The survey is part of the EU Citizens project and the results can be found at: http://www.eu-citizens.org/
[2] http://europa.eu/citizens-2013/
[3] http://www.foeeurope.org/Parliament-act-potential-case-conflict-interest...
[4] http://www.alter-eu.org/documents/2013/01/ngos-demand-commission-impleme...
The Frank Bold Society and the Neighbourhood Association Uhelná called on the Czech government today to be more consistent in its negotiations with Poland over mining at the Turów brown coal mine. According to both organisations, the government did not have enough information or time to prepare an agreement that would truly protect Czech interests. Moreover, the government has acted in a non-transparent manner by failing to inform the public in advance of the terms of the agreement being prepared, which should lead to the withdrawal of the action against Poland at the EU Court of Justice. The organisations have therefore drawn up a document with seven basic demands on which the Czech side should insist.
The European Commission recently introduced a draft of the revised EU ETS Directive which, among other things, proposes that 100 % of ETS revenues should be used for environmental measures. We welcome this idea but we’re also sceptical about how the ETS revenues are used in the Czech Republic. Therefore, we have prepared an analysis mapping the use of ETS revenues in Czech Republic and sent it to the European Commission as an input for the recent public consultation. The main conclusions are presented below.
We have analysed hundreds of pages of technical documents and prepared a comprehensive overview of the sustainability reporting requirements under the forthcoming EU legislation. We summarise what ESG data will be critical for companies, banks, and investors in sustainability strategy and management and in the areas of climate change, environment, sustainable activities, employees and supply chains, due diligence, and anti-corruption measures.
