home
news

Updated EU Sustainability Legislation Overview: Your Post-Omnibus Guide

share this article

Read our just-released up-to-date briefing covering key EU sustainability law, including what has changed in the EU with the Omnibus reforms and what it means for businesses.

Over the course of the last year, the European Commission proposed several amendments to existing European sustainability legislation under various Omnibus packages and legislative reviews, with the stated aim of simplifying and reducing burden for companies. These include changes to the scope, timelines and substance of the affected legislative acts.

This new briefing is an update of our 2025 study and provides key clarifications of the evolving regulatory context in the EU.

What will you find?

  • A summary of critical changes proposed and adopted  
  • In-depth review of the relations and changes across three key areas:  
  • Risk assessment and management,  
  • Climate Transition Plans and GHG emissions calculations and  
  • Reporting and access to information

For whom is this analysis?

  • Companies who want to build upon their understanding of their obligations under each EU sustainability law, especially in the context of changes following the Omnibus Simplification Package
  • Auditors and supervisory authorities looking to consolidate their knowledge of EU sustainability legislation requirements in the current regulatory environment  
  • National and European civil society organisations seeking a comprehensive view of legal mechanisms in the EU to promote corporate transparency and accountability on sustainability matters

Why download this analysis?

  • Be on top of the latest updates and emerging developments at the EU level  
  • Ensure that you have a clear overview of EU sustainability law given the recent changes, including their impact on implementation and interoperability between legislations

Download the guide

*The guide covers the following: the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD), the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), the EU Taxonomy, the European Emissions Trading System (EU ETS), the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), the Industrial Emissions Directive (IED), the European Batteries Regulations (EUBR), the European Deforestation Regulation (EUDR), the Conflict Minerals Regulation (CMR), and the Forced Labour Regulation (FLR). It builds on a previous briefing published in 2025 where you can find an additional Annex regarding calculation of GHG emissions.

This publication is part of a project funded by the European Climate Initiative (EUKI), which aims to support practical implementation of EU sustainability legislation by providing high-quality, publicly accessible research and expert guidance. To find out more, visit www.euki.de/en.

    (
)

You may also like these news

All news
2/13/2018

A Major Win for Air Quality in Prague

Prague Municipal Court ruled today in favour better protection of human health from air pollution in the capital of the Czech Republic. The Court revoked most of Prague's Air Quality Management Plan, issued in 2016 by the Czech Ministry of Environment.

All news
12/21/2017

A Major Win for Air Quality in the Most Pollution Afflicted Region of the Czech Republic

Czech Supreme Administrative Court ruled yesterday in favour of air quality and protection of human health. In the case local citizens and an NGO from Ostrava agglomeration, the most polluted region in the Czech Republic, succeeded with their claim for better air quality.

All news
12/5/2017

Inhabitant of Ostrava suffering from lung cancer sues the Ministry of the Environment for air pollution

Yesterday, on 5 November 2018, a lawsuit against the Ministry of the Environment (MoE) on liability for health damages and death of her husband from lung cancer was filed with the District Court in Prague 10. The plaintiff seeks damages for lung cancer, which she has managed to cure, but her husband has succumbed to the illness in October. The cause of the disease is seen in the long-term excessive concentration of air pollutants at their place of residence in Ostrava-Radvanice and in the fact that the MoE failed to provide effective measures to decrease the pollution to legal limit values.