Today, the European Parliament has adopted its negotiating position on the proposal for a Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD). A majority of 366 Members of the Parliament voted in favour of almost all the amendments endorsed by the Committee on Legal Affairs in April, with 225 votes against and 38 abstentions.
The vote reflects cross-party support for an enhanced contribution by businesses to sustainability and a clear mandate for the rapporteur to negotiate with the Commission and the Council.
The Parliament’s proposed amendments reinforce the risk-based approach to due diligence compared to the Commission’s proposal and the Council General Approach, in line with international standards on business and human rights. They also strengthen the provisions on stakeholder consultation and due diligence duties.
The text adopted by the Parliament is a step forward regarding the contribution by the financial sector to more sustainable value chains. Investors will have to work with their investees in order to tackle adverse impacts on human rights and the environment.
Regarding the duty of companies to contribute to climate action, the plenary strengthened the Commission’s proposal to require that companies adopt and implement transition plans. The adopted amendments detail the content of transition plans to ensure that companies contribute to global climate goals. Moreover, Parliament incorporates the proposal by its Committee on the Environment to link variable remuneration to climate transition plans.
On the downside, the final outcome falls short of ensuring a coherent, company-wide implementation of due diligence by requiring oversight by directors. This is crucial in order to prevent compliance departments from operating in a silo. Not requiring the involvement of directors is a key shortcoming of the plenary outcome, including relative to the Commission proposal, which was already only a first step towards clarifying directors’ duties.
By adopting a negotiating position for the European Parliament, the vote in Plenary today concludes the first stage of the legislative process, where the Parliament and the Council adopt their position relative to the initial proposal by the Commission. Now, the three institutions will enter into trilogues to agree on the final shape of the directive. Frank Bold calls on all institutions to prioritise the negotiations for the CSDDD in order to reach agreement on it before the end of the mandate.
The Frank Bold Society and the Neighbourhood Association Uhelná called on the Czech government today to be more consistent in its negotiations with Poland over mining at the Turów brown coal mine. According to both organisations, the government did not have enough information or time to prepare an agreement that would truly protect Czech interests. Moreover, the government has acted in a non-transparent manner by failing to inform the public in advance of the terms of the agreement being prepared, which should lead to the withdrawal of the action against Poland at the EU Court of Justice. The organisations have therefore drawn up a document with seven basic demands on which the Czech side should insist.
The European Commission recently introduced a draft of the revised EU ETS Directive which, among other things, proposes that 100 % of ETS revenues should be used for environmental measures. We welcome this idea but we’re also sceptical about how the ETS revenues are used in the Czech Republic. Therefore, we have prepared an analysis mapping the use of ETS revenues in Czech Republic and sent it to the European Commission as an input for the recent public consultation. The main conclusions are presented below.
We have analysed hundreds of pages of technical documents and prepared a comprehensive overview of the sustainability reporting requirements under the forthcoming EU legislation. We summarise what ESG data will be critical for companies, banks, and investors in sustainability strategy and management and in the areas of climate change, environment, sustainable activities, employees and supply chains, due diligence, and anti-corruption measures.
