home
news

Research: Are Businesses Embracing the ESRS and How Can Policymakers Avoid Creating Legal Uncertainty Around its Application

share this article

The study on the sustainability disclosures of 100 influential companies from high-impact sectors provides an early reflection on the general readiness for businesses in the EU to meet the expectations of the upcoming EU sustainability rules and standards. Our report contributes to identifying the main challenges, as well as to highlight emerging good practices.

Following the EU Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), large companies will start to report in accordance with the first set of sector-agnostic European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS) in 2025.

This legal framework was adopted to enhance and modernise companies reporting on sustainability matters, with the objective of addressing a market failure in providing relevant, comparable and decision-useful sustainability information.

We assessed the presence and quality of key disclosures according to the requirements and expectations of the EU Sustainability Reporting Standards on: 

  • Double materiality assessment (process and outcomes)
  • Climate-related disclosures and Transition Plans (connection to commitments,completeness and quality of disclosures)
  • Sustainability due diligence (connection with double materiality assessment, governance and stakeholder engagement)
  • Biodiversity (consideration in double materiality assessment, specific impact and metrics)

We examined sustainability statements of 100 influential EU companies in top 5 high-impacts sectors prioritised for the development of EU sector standards: Textiles, Finance, Road Transportation, Energy, Food & Beverage.

Download the study “Preparation for implementation of the EU Sustainability Reporting Standards
Download the executive summary translated to French | German | Spanish | Italian | Czech (coming soon) | Polish (coming soon)

For whom is this analysis?

The evidence and recommendations drawn from this research aims to support

  • Companies in their understanding and implementation of the ESRS
  • Auditors and supervisory authorities’ engagement with preparers
  • Policy-makers in supporting a pragmatic and common sense application of the EU rules and standards 

Why download this analysis?

  • Gain insights into current and emerging practices in companies’ sustainability disclosures according to the ESRS
  • Explore our  practical recommendations to prevent  overcompliance or “box-ticking” approaches that distract companies from essential and material information
  • Access our targeted  proposals to support implementation and consider simplification measures

Find out more during the launch webinar

On November 19, we will hold a webinar presenting the key findings and recommendations of the study. We will also put in context the main aspects gaining attention in the political sphere.

Look forward to hearing from:

  • Tom Dodd, Directorate-General FISMA, European Commission
  • Amanda Soler Guzmán, amfori
  • Aleksandra Palinska, Eurosif
  • Filip Gregor, Frank Bold
Research: Preparation for implementation of the ESRS
    (
1.8 MB
)

You may also like these news

Big shift in case of Turów mine. The European Commission has proved Czechia right

In mid-December, the European Commission acknowledged a large part of the arguments put forward by the Czechia in an effort to prevent the expansion and continuation of illegal mining at the Turów mine in Poland, that endangers the sources of drinking water for thousands of people in the Liberec region and, according to new studies, has serious impacts on groundwater in Germany as well. Frank Bold's lawyers, who defend the interests of Czech citizens, have long been involved in the case.

Mining in Turów: Seven demands for an agreement with Poland to protect the Czech communities

The Frank Bold Society and the Neighbourhood Association Uhelná called on the Czech government today to be more consistent in its negotiations with Poland over mining at the Turów brown coal mine. According to both organisations, the government did not have enough information or time to prepare an agreement that would truly protect Czech interests. Moreover, the government has acted in a non-transparent manner by failing to inform the public in advance of the terms of the agreement being prepared, which should lead to the withdrawal of the action against Poland at the EU Court of Justice. The organisations have therefore drawn up a document with seven basic demands on which the Czech side should insist.

Frank Bold points out non-transparent handling of ETS revenues and potential violation of EU law

The European Commission recently introduced a draft of the revised EU ETS Directive which, among other things, proposes that 100 % of ETS revenues should be used for environmental measures. We welcome this idea but we’re also sceptical about how the ETS revenues are used in the Czech Republic. Therefore, we have prepared an analysis mapping the use of ETS revenues in Czech Republic and sent it to the European Commission as an input for the recent public consultation. The main conclusions are presented below.