home
news

People want more transparency and lobbying regulation

2/1/2013
All news
share this article

European poll shows considerable concern about EU ethics.

A majority of people across Europe are concerned about ethics and lobbying in European Union policy-making, and want better regulation of lobbyists, as well as increased transparency of the EU, according to a new opinion poll. [1]

The poll conducted by TNS opinion, and completed by over 6,000 people in six European countries, reveals that three quarters (73%) of respondents are concerned that lobbyists representing the business sector have too much influence on EU decisions. 80% of those surveyed believe there should be mandatory regulation of lobbying to ensure a balanced participation of different interests in decision-making.

The results come at the beginning of the European Year of Citizens, which aims to stimulate dialogue between governments and society, and thereby better engage citizens in debates and decisions that affect them. [2]

Natacha Cingotti from Friends of the Earth Europe said: “The results of this poll should be a wake-up call for European decision-makers. Citizens are clearly asking for compulsory regulation for lobbying. The Parliament should insist that this happens by making the Transparency Register mandatory. This poll also signals that the poor enforcement of the MEP code of conduct negatively affects citizens’ confidence. Strict implementation and monitoring of MEPs’ second jobs are urgently needed to avoid conflicts of interest.” [3]

4 out of 5 people polled (80%) said they feel less confident that an MEP represents the best interests of citizens if they also work for a lobby group or a private company. French respondents (76%) felt the most strongly that MEPs should not be allowed to work for a lobby group or a private company while they are serving as elected representatives.

The survey reflects mounting concerns among the European public about lobbying in Brussels after recent scandals such as that surrounding the resignation of EU Health and Consumer Policy Commissioner John Dalli, which indicated that representatives of the tobacco industry had privileged access to key EU decision-makers. The report which resulted in the resignation has still not been made public. [4]

The poll also reveals a huge demand for greater transparency. 85% of respondents think that full information about Member States’ negotiations should be open to the public. In the context of the response to the financial crisis, 84% of people find it important that full documentation about what the European Central Bank is doing is publicly available; this is currently not the case.

“This survey confirms the findings of the EU Citizens project conducted over the past year, namely that members of the public are hungry for more information about what is happening in Brussels, and specifically that they want to know about decision-making and spending: 86% of respondents found it important that detailed financial reports and evaluations on how EU money is spent by member states is made publicly available,” said Helen Darbishire, executive director of Access Info Europe.

This survey is part of the EU Citizens project, a joint project between the following organisations: Access Info Europe, Aitec, Environmental Law Service, Friends of the Earth Europe, Health Action International, Spinwatch. The opinion poll is supported by Arbeitskammer Europa (AK Europa).

The full survey results, including country-by-country figures, are available at: www.eu-citizens.org and at: www.foeeurope.org/eucitizenspoll

For more information please contact:

In Brussels:
Natacha Cingotti, transparency campaigner at Friends of the Earth Europe, natacha.cingotti@foeeurope.org ; +32-2-893-1023, +32-4-9294-8898
Francesca Gater, communications officer at Friends of the Earth Europe,  francesca.gater@foeeurope.org ; +32-2-893-1010, +32-4-8593-0515

In Madrid:
Pamela Bartlett, Access Info, pam@access-info.org , +34 91 356 6558

Notes to editors:

[1] The survey was conducted by TNS opinion in six EU Member States: Austria, Czech Republic, France, the Netherlands, Spain and the UK. Approximately 1,000 surveys were completed online in each country from 17–23 January.  The survey is part of the EU Citizens project and the results can be found at: http://www.eu-citizens.org/
[2] http://europa.eu/citizens-2013/
[3] http://www.foeeurope.org/Parliament-act-potential-case-conflict-interest...
[4] http://www.alter-eu.org/documents/2013/01/ngos-demand-commission-impleme...

    (
)

You may also like these news

Sustainable value chains: European Parliament adopts its negotiating position on the Corporate Sustainability due Diligence Directive

Today, the European Parliament has adopted its negotiating position on the proposal for a Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD).  A majority of 366 Members of the Parliament voted in favour of almost all the amendments endorsed by the Committee on Legal Affairs in April, with 225 votes against and 38 abstentions.

Study: examples from four countries show how to decarbonise the heating sector. Local renewables are the future

More than a half of the energy consumed in the EU is used to heat and cool homes, offices, shops and other premises. In the context of the EU's efforts to reduce emissions, the decarbonisation of the heating sector is therefore inevitable. But how to achieve a successful transformation of the heating sector in the Czech Republic? We have reviewed examples of community heating plants abroad and outlined solutions applicable in CZ as well.

Upholding EU’s Sustainability Leadership: The Imperative for Ambitious Reporting Standards

By the end of July, the European Commission is expected to adopt its first set of sustainability reporting standards (ESRS). The standards will impact 50,000 European companies and thousands international corporate groups. As part of the EU Corporate Sustainability Directive (CSRD) ecosystem, they will require large companies to report information on their sustainability impacts on people and planet as well as their sustainability-related risks and opportunities.