home
news

Leading academics publish crucial policy recommendations to make corporate governance more sustainable

share this article

With less than a decade left to address the threat of climate change, the EU Commission has launched its Green Deal. And today, the EU Finnish Presidency conference on company law and climate change addresses the emerging consensus that businesses need to be held accountable for their contribution.

The recognition that sustainability in the EU and beyond needs to be embedded in corporate governance has led over 60 leading academics to endorse a statement that addresses the pressure and incentives for companies to prioritise short-term profits at the expense of environmental, social or even companies’ own long-term economic sustainability.

In order to clarify the obligations of company boards and directors and make corporate governance* practice significantly more sustainable and focused on the long term, the signatories recommend that:

  • Directors are obliged to develop, disclose and implement a forward-looking corporate sustainability strategy that identifies and addresses material environmental and social issues and significant impacts connected to the company’s business model, operations and supply chain. Such strategy must:some text
    • include verifiable targets and clearly ensure the respect for the planetary boundaries and human rights
    • specify a limited set of sector-specific issues and connect public objectives
    • link a percentage of the KPIs and remuneration of executive management to the achievement of measurable targets
  • Company boards must discuss and sign off on an annual progress report and a non-executive committee should monitor and review the implementation of the strategy
  • A national regulatory body should be empowered to bring proceedings against the executive directors where non-implementation has caused serious harm to third parties or unlawful harm to the environment.

The statement is signed by many highly respected voices in the fields of company law, corporate governance and management, including Robert G. Eccles (Visiting Professor at the University of Oxford and previously Professor at Harvard Business School), Simon Deakin (Professor at the University of Cambridge), Katharina Pistor (Professor at the Columbia University) and Rick Wartzman (Executive Director of the Drucker Institute), Marie-Laure Djelic (Sciences Po), Blanche Segrestin (Mines ParisTech) and Beate Sjåfjell (University of Oslo).

Contact:

The statement remains open for signing - interested parties are encouraged to contact us at:

Jeroen Veldman
Associate Professor, Nyenrode Business University
jeroen.veldman@gmail.com

Susanna Arus
Communications and EU Public Affairs at Frank Bold
susanna.arus@frankbold.org

*The EU Commission’s Action Plan on Financing Sustainable Growth published in 2018 outlined preparatory work on sustainable corporate governance in Action 10. See here.

Corporate Governance for Sustainability 2
    (
744 kB
)

You may also like these news

Finalisation of European ESG reporting rules: CSRD adopted and standards published

The European Parliament has adopted the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), which clarifies transparency obligations for large companies operating in the EU on their sustainability impacts, risks, and opportunities. Pursuant to the CSRD, companies across all sectors will report against the European Sustainability Reporting Standards, which were developed by the European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG), submitted to the European Commission and published on 22 November.

Alliance
3/7/2023

Civil Society Organisations Urge the European Commission to Adopt an Ambitious Set of Sector-Agnostic Reporting Standards

NGOs and civil society groups will only support an ambitious first set of sector-agnostic ESRS that closely builds on the EFRAG drafts adopted last November. They urge the Commission to follow EFRAG’s technical advice alongside 60+ companies and investors worth 651bn USD, and caution against making significant changes at this stage, as this would risk discrediting the process so far and undoing a good compromise.

Summary of the Turów case

Governments turning a blind eye to Illegal lignite mining in Turów: Local communities and the environment suffer.