home
news

How to Start Your Climate Risk Assessment: A Practical Guide for Companies

share this article

Climate risk is now a core business issue. Climate change is reshaping the business landscape, through physical disruptions to assets and operations, accelerating the urgent need to transition to a low-carbon economy. For companies of all sizes, understanding and managing these risks is no longer optional.

Climate change creates severe risks on companies’ assets, sites and business activities both in direct operations and across value chains. These may originate from physical hazards such as floods or droughts, as well as transition pressures that include new regulations, carbon pricing, or shifting market conditions. These risks can significantly affect business viability, while lenders, investors, and regulators are increasingly expecting companies to identify, assess, and disclose them.

Yet for many organisations, knowing where and how to start remains the biggest challenge for many organisations.

To help address this, we publish a practical guidance on conducting climate risk assessments, which looks at the needs and critical steps for both small companies and those with more companies handling complex business models. Our aim is to make the process more accessible, proportionate and focused - whether businesses are running a first screening or refining an already established methodology.

What the guidance covers:

The guidance walks through the full assessment process step by step: from defining the project objective and selecting sites and economic activities, through mapping climate hazards and transition events, to conducting qualitative and quantitative analysis and presenting results. It also addresses how to use assessment findings effectively, embedding them into risk management, resilience planning, transition strategies, and sustainability reporting.

A key principle throughout is proportionality and prioritisation: the guidance is designed to be useful for organisations with straightforward business models and limited resources, as well as for larger companies with complex operations and geographically dispersed assets. The aim is to move beyond a tick-box exercise and help organisations treat climate risk assessment as a genuine strategic tool.

The guidance is designed for:

  • Sustainability officers, ESG managers, and other professionals responsible for delivering climate risk assessments
  • Decision-makers who rely on climate risk information to inform strategy, including department directors and board members
  • Organisations at any stage of the assessment process - from first iteration to advanced quantitative analysis
Download the guidance

We are currently gathering feedback from companies, financial market actors and other experts. The guide is therefore subject to targeted improvements and updates based on input received. If you would like to contribute to the consultation, you can use this public form or contact david.nemecek@frankbold.org.
    (
)

You may also like these news

All news
2/1/2013

People want more transparency and lobbying regulation

European poll shows considerable concern about EU ethics.

Report on Human Rights Due Diligence and the Role of States

The International Corporate Accountability Roundtable (ICAR) along with the European Coalition for Corporate Justice (ECCJ) and the Canadian Network on Corporate Accountability (CNCA) launched a report by International Experts on Business and Human Rights, entitled “Human Rights Due Diligence: the Role of States”. The International Experts commissioned included Professor Olivier De Schutter, Professor Anita Ramasastry, Mark B. Taylor and Robert C. Thompson.

Human Rights Due Diligence Report Launch & Reception

The International Corporate Accountability Roundtable (ICAR), the European Coalition for Corporate Justice (ECCJ) and the Canadian Network on Corporate Accountability (CNCA), are pleased to announce the launch of our Human Rights Due Diligence Report, the common approaches and available options resulting from the “Human Rights Due Diligence Project.”