Several German ministries led by the Socialist and Green parties have sent a letter to the EU Commission with the objective of rolling back European legislation on corporate sustainability reporting. This legal framework will be applicable to 27 EU Member States as of January 1st, 2025, but German parties, immersed in electoral and political infighting, are using this legislation to promise quick, but dysfunctional solutions.
Companies across the EU (and globally) are already preparing and investing to comply with the EU CSRD and the sustainability standards. Certain countries like Denmark, Sweden and Spain had already expanded the previous legislation to incorporate more companies to report on sustainability data. The attempts coming from Germany are undermining other Member States’s efforts that are focusing their attention on supporting companies instead of confusing them and creating major legal uncertainty.
Regarding the content of their letter, German ministries prepared a set of proposals without engaging with relevant internal and external experts, proposing a sort of ‘magic potion’ that completely misses the point (or directly and intentionally misleads) how the CSRD and EU standards have been built.
The EU standards are by nature a business tool for companies to identify and address their sustainability risks and impacts from a strategic perspective. They address a market failure to deliver convergence and consolidation between different frameworks and standards.Moreover, the conflation of proposals from German ministries would break the information system between companies that has been established in European legislation, based on international standards.Sustainability reporting is the basis of a sustainable finance system whose purpose is to direct capital towards transition and innovation. With this framework, companies are guided to focus on what is really relevant for them, ensuring comparability and curbing greenwashing.
The CSRD system is key to ensure a level playing field, requiring transparency from non-EU companies and supporting EU manufacturing against unfair competition that does not respect fundamental human rights and environmental standards.
This reaction has been prepared by Frank Bold and is supported by WWF EU.
The respect of human rights is the most fundamental value that we have as a society. Nevertheless, economic globalisation has lead to the massive exploitation of human rights in developing countries for the benefit of multinational enterprises (MNEs). The outsourcing and offshoring of production and services have had huge environmental and social costs.
The European Parliament approved last weekthe proposed college of Commissioners. Věra Jourová successfully faced the public grilling and will become the Commissioner for Justice, Consumers and Gender Equality. Due to the shift of competencies within the Commission, Ms. Jourová will have an opportunity to influence the governance and rules of the game for multinational corporations.
A new independent study by Czech, Polish and Slovakian watchdogs identifies major gaps both in the national and EU legal framework that fundamentally increase the risk of political corruption and allow misuse of EU funds. The comparative analysis complements the long-delayed first EU Anti-corruption report released today.
