Several German ministries led by the Socialist and Green parties have sent a letter to the EU Commission with the objective of rolling back European legislation on corporate sustainability reporting. This legal framework will be applicable to 27 EU Member States as of January 1st, 2025, but German parties, immersed in electoral and political infighting, are using this legislation to promise quick, but dysfunctional solutions.
Companies across the EU (and globally) are already preparing and investing to comply with the EU CSRD and the sustainability standards. Certain countries like Denmark, Sweden and Spain had already expanded the previous legislation to incorporate more companies to report on sustainability data. The attempts coming from Germany are undermining other Member States’s efforts that are focusing their attention on supporting companies instead of confusing them and creating major legal uncertainty.
Regarding the content of their letter, German ministries prepared a set of proposals without engaging with relevant internal and external experts, proposing a sort of ‘magic potion’ that completely misses the point (or directly and intentionally misleads) how the CSRD and EU standards have been built.
The EU standards are by nature a business tool for companies to identify and address their sustainability risks and impacts from a strategic perspective. They address a market failure to deliver convergence and consolidation between different frameworks and standards.Moreover, the conflation of proposals from German ministries would break the information system between companies that has been established in European legislation, based on international standards.Sustainability reporting is the basis of a sustainable finance system whose purpose is to direct capital towards transition and innovation. With this framework, companies are guided to focus on what is really relevant for them, ensuring comparability and curbing greenwashing.
The CSRD system is key to ensure a level playing field, requiring transparency from non-EU companies and supporting EU manufacturing against unfair competition that does not respect fundamental human rights and environmental standards.
This reaction has been prepared by Frank Bold and is supported by WWF EU.
In mid-December, the European Commission acknowledged a large part of the arguments put forward by the Czechia in an effort to prevent the expansion and continuation of illegal mining at the Turów mine in Poland, that endangers the sources of drinking water for thousands of people in the Liberec region and, according to new studies, has serious impacts on groundwater in Germany as well. Frank Bold's lawyers, who defend the interests of Czech citizens, have long been involved in the case.
The Frank Bold Society and the Neighbourhood Association Uhelná called on the Czech government today to be more consistent in its negotiations with Poland over mining at the Turów brown coal mine. According to both organisations, the government did not have enough information or time to prepare an agreement that would truly protect Czech interests. Moreover, the government has acted in a non-transparent manner by failing to inform the public in advance of the terms of the agreement being prepared, which should lead to the withdrawal of the action against Poland at the EU Court of Justice. The organisations have therefore drawn up a document with seven basic demands on which the Czech side should insist.
The European Commission recently introduced a draft of the revised EU ETS Directive which, among other things, proposes that 100 % of ETS revenues should be used for environmental measures. We welcome this idea but we’re also sceptical about how the ETS revenues are used in the Czech Republic. Therefore, we have prepared an analysis mapping the use of ETS revenues in Czech Republic and sent it to the European Commission as an input for the recent public consultation. The main conclusions are presented below.
