home
news

Frank Bold Launches Database of Good Sustainability Reporting Practices

share this article

By approaching sustainability strategically, companies can turn corporate reporting into a powerful tool to identify their exposure to climate and social risks in their value chains, future-proof the resilience of their business model and build trust with investors, customers and partners alike.

Yet many companies still struggle with a fundamental question: what does good reporting look like?  

To help answer that, Frank Bold has launched a database of good and emerging practices in corporate sustainability disclosures. Predominantly based on 2025 reports, this is a living resource that will be continually updated with assessments of newly released sustainability reports.

In a European landscape shaped by the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) and the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS), the quality of disclosures is increasingly what sets leaders apart from those merely ticking boxes.

What our Database Offers

Drawing on companies’ annual reports, the database showcases examples from companies fairly presenting their sustainability impacts and risks. It is an interactive resource covering topics such as:

  • Climate transition plans, risk assessments and greenhouse gas disclosures
  • Double materiality assessment
  • Identification and management of material impacts, risks, and opportunities
  • Disclosures on sustainability due diligence  

Users can filter by topic, country, and sector to find the examples most relevant to their context. Each entry is accompanied by expert commentary from Frank Bold's team, highlighting what makes the disclosure effective and where to find the specific information within the company's report.

Relevant and decision-useful information signals to the market that a company genuinely understands its risks and opportunities—and has a credible strategy to address them.

Whether you are preparing your first CSRD-aligned report or refining an established disclosure process, seeing how peers and industry leaders handle complex topics—from human rights impacts to climate risk assessments—can provide the concrete reference points that guidance documents alone cannot.

Access to the database is free.

Register now

Please note that the analysis focused on the quality of sustainability information disclosed by companies and does not constitute an evaluation of their performance or strategy. All claims regarding inconsistencies with information presented can be directed to Frank Bold.

    (
)

You may also like these news

Analysis: Companies failing to report meaningful information about their impacts on society and the environment

Under the Alliance for Corporate Transparency project Frank Bold and its partners have analysed how European companies disclose information necessary for understanding their impact on society and the environment, as required by the EU Non-financial Reporting Directive*.

Grants are not enough. Air polluters must bear the responsibility and the State must start to solve the problem quickly

People in the Czech Republic have the right to fresh air but this right is being violated and it is necessary to take effective measures. Representatives of the European Commission, Czech government, industry and Non-Governmental Organizations‘ (NGO) all agree on that.

Coal phase-out and integration of renewables? Czech power grid poses no obstacle

What would happen to Czech power grid in 2030 if all coal power plants were shut down? On 24 May we have publicly presented a study which simulates this scenario. The result is that even without coal-fired generation it is possible to ensure stable electricity supply in the Czech Republic. The scenario includes an increase in renewables to which the current state of the power grid is no obstacle.