Frank Bold has recently become a certified B Corporation for its activities as a law firm. This new status reflects the firm’s general policy of combining its business activities with socially valuable objectives.
The B Corporation label is a certification process demonstrating that a company adheres to the highest standards of verified social and environmental performance, public transparency, and legal accountability. It also shows that a company is dedicated to using the power of markets to solve social and environmental problems.
B Corps are part of a growing movement that aims at redefining success in business, so that it is not limited to making profit but extends to creating benefit for the society and the planet. It thus goes a step further than the numerous initiatives targetting the avoidance or limitation of social and environmental adverse impacts.
B Corporation certification is supervised by B Lab, a non-profit organisation that serves the expanding global movement of people ‘using business as a force of good’. Certification is granted to companies that pass B Lab’s Impact Assessment, which includes detailed and standardised impact assessment indicators, as well as a customised platform for measuring those impacts. Companies must also meet the legal requirements for accountability set by B Lab. These requirements depend on the company’s state of incorporation and corporate structure.
The median score for businesses completing the B Impact Assessment is 55 points. To be certified, businesses must earn a verified score of 80 points. For the year 2016, Frank Bold earned 96 points for its commercial activities. Frank Bold has a unique hybrid structure that brings together (1) a Certified B Corp law firm that services primarily commercial clients that meet ethical guidelines set by the organisation, and (2) a non-profit section that benefits from funding from Frank Bold’s business activities, charitable foundations and other entities in order to fulfill its mission. Frank Bold as a whole shares the purpose of creating public benefit by solving social and environmental problems.
Today, more than 1,700 corporations are Certified B Corps, coming from 42 countries and covering over 120 industries. This includes several world-wide known brands such as Ben & Jerry’s (a subsidiary of global consumer product giant Unilever), and Patagonia, as well as publicly traded companies, such as the e-commerce site Etsy, cosmetics maker Natura, and Triodos bank.
By becoming a B Corp, Frank Bold has entered a leading business community, which proves its ability to do business by directly serving social and environmental interests.
Further information is avaialble on the official B-Corporation website: http://www.bcorporation.net.
***
Text edited by Sandrine Brachotte
In mid-December, the European Commission acknowledged a large part of the arguments put forward by the Czechia in an effort to prevent the expansion and continuation of illegal mining at the Turów mine in Poland, that endangers the sources of drinking water for thousands of people in the Liberec region and, according to new studies, has serious impacts on groundwater in Germany as well. Frank Bold's lawyers, who defend the interests of Czech citizens, have long been involved in the case.
The Frank Bold Society and the Neighbourhood Association Uhelná called on the Czech government today to be more consistent in its negotiations with Poland over mining at the Turów brown coal mine. According to both organisations, the government did not have enough information or time to prepare an agreement that would truly protect Czech interests. Moreover, the government has acted in a non-transparent manner by failing to inform the public in advance of the terms of the agreement being prepared, which should lead to the withdrawal of the action against Poland at the EU Court of Justice. The organisations have therefore drawn up a document with seven basic demands on which the Czech side should insist.
The European Commission recently introduced a draft of the revised EU ETS Directive which, among other things, proposes that 100 % of ETS revenues should be used for environmental measures. We welcome this idea but we’re also sceptical about how the ETS revenues are used in the Czech Republic. Therefore, we have prepared an analysis mapping the use of ETS revenues in Czech Republic and sent it to the European Commission as an input for the recent public consultation. The main conclusions are presented below.
