Sarah Chenoun
Communications Officer, on parental leave
Join us for our upcoming webinar where we will present the key findings from our analysis of sustainability disclosures by 15 largest investors and 45 investment funds.
📅 When? 13.12.2024 from 10 am to 11 am CET
Look forward to hearing from:
In this webinar, we will explore the state of play and the future of reporting according to Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR). You will learn more on the current reporting practice and the outlook for the SFDR review in 2025. The panel will also offer insights regarding the SFDR review from DG FISMA and Eurosif.
The study covers analysed entity level disclosures of 15 major investors and their product level disclosures of 45 investment funds that claim compliance with Article 8 or Article 9 of SFDR. We analysed their objectives, method, targets and performance measurement approach.
The findings and conclusions from our research will inform the upcoming review of the SFDR and guidance of investor sustainability reporting.
People in the Czech Republic have the right to fresh air but this right is being violated and it is necessary to take effective measures. Representatives of the European Commission, Czech government, industry and Non-Governmental Organizations‘ (NGO) all agree on that.
What would happen to Czech power grid in 2030 if all coal power plants were shut down? On 24 May we have publicly presented a study which simulates this scenario. The result is that even without coal-fired generation it is possible to ensure stable electricity supply in the Czech Republic. The scenario includes an increase in renewables to which the current state of the power grid is no obstacle.
Czech Supreme Administrative Court ruled today in favour better protection of human health from air pollution in Brno, a Czech city with 370 thousand inhabitants. The Court revoked the city's Air Quality Management Plan, issued in 2016 by the Czech Ministry of Environment. The reasoning of the ruling has not been made public yet, but the main argument against the plan was that it was not effective enough and would not lead to a swift achievement of the binding air quality standards. A similar ruling was issued in December 2017 with respect to Ostrava and in February 2018 regarding Prague and Usti region.
