home
news

Updated EU Sustainability Legislation Overview: Your Post-Omnibus Guide

share this article

Read our just-released up-to-date briefing covering key EU sustainability law, including what has changed in the EU with the Omnibus reforms and what it means for businesses.

Over the course of the last year, the European Commission proposed several amendments to existing European sustainability legislation under various Omnibus packages and legislative reviews, with the stated aim of simplifying and reducing burden for companies. These include changes to the scope, timelines and substance of the affected legislative acts.

This new briefing is an update of our 2025 study and provides key clarifications of the evolving regulatory context in the EU.

What will you find?

  • A summary of critical changes proposed and adopted  
  • In-depth review of the relations and changes across three key areas:  
  • Risk assessment and management,  
  • Climate Transition Plans and GHG emissions calculations and  
  • Reporting and access to information

For whom is this analysis?

  • Companies who want to build upon their understanding of their obligations under each EU sustainability law, especially in the context of changes following the Omnibus Simplification Package
  • Auditors and supervisory authorities looking to consolidate their knowledge of EU sustainability legislation requirements in the current regulatory environment  
  • National and European civil society organisations seeking a comprehensive view of legal mechanisms in the EU to promote corporate transparency and accountability on sustainability matters

Why download this analysis?

  • Be on top of the latest updates and emerging developments at the EU level  
  • Ensure that you have a clear overview of EU sustainability law given the recent changes, including their impact on implementation and interoperability between legislations

Download the guide

*The guide covers the following: the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD), the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), the EU Taxonomy, the European Emissions Trading System (EU ETS), the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), the Industrial Emissions Directive (IED), the European Batteries Regulations (EUBR), the European Deforestation Regulation (EUDR), the Conflict Minerals Regulation (CMR), and the Forced Labour Regulation (FLR). It builds on a previous briefing published in 2025 where you can find an additional Annex regarding calculation of GHG emissions.

This publication is part of a project funded by the European Climate Initiative (EUKI), which aims to support practical implementation of EU sustainability legislation by providing high-quality, publicly accessible research and expert guidance. To find out more, visit www.euki.de/en.

    (
)

You may also like these news

Seven demands for an agreement with Poland on mining in the Turów mine that will protect Czech communities

Frank Bold Society and the Neighbourhood Association Uhelná have drawn up a document with seven basic requirements that the Czech side should insist on when negotiating with Poland. See the press release for background information.

Inaction is not an option: specific solutions to tackle sustainability gaps in corporate governance

In the face of recent opposition addressed to the EU Commission by some business associations and specific governments from Nordic Europe, NGOs have reiterated their support for the European Commission commitment to present an initiative on Sustainable Corporate Governance in 2021, following the roadmap set in the EU Green Deal and the Action Plan on Sustainable Finance.

Civil society organisations call on policymakers to define meaningful supply chain reporting requirements

As part of the reform of the EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive, the European Commission plans to develop mandatory EU sustainability reporting standards. The analysis of the non-financial reports of 1000 European companies by the Alliance for Corporate Transparency has proven how companies fail to report relevant, specific and comparable information. While this is true for all sustainability matters, it is particularly exacerbated in the case of corporate impacts and risks along the supply chain.