Today, the European Parliament has adopted its negotiating position on the proposal for a Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD). A majority of 366 Members of the Parliament voted in favour of almost all the amendments endorsed by the Committee on Legal Affairs in April, with 225 votes against and 38 abstentions.
The vote reflects cross-party support for an enhanced contribution by businesses to sustainability and a clear mandate for the rapporteur to negotiate with the Commission and the Council.
The Parliament’s proposed amendments reinforce the risk-based approach to due diligence compared to the Commission’s proposal and the Council General Approach, in line with international standards on business and human rights. They also strengthen the provisions on stakeholder consultation and due diligence duties.
The text adopted by the Parliament is a step forward regarding the contribution by the financial sector to more sustainable value chains. Investors will have to work with their investees in order to tackle adverse impacts on human rights and the environment.
Regarding the duty of companies to contribute to climate action, the plenary strengthened the Commission’s proposal to require that companies adopt and implement transition plans. The adopted amendments detail the content of transition plans to ensure that companies contribute to global climate goals. Moreover, Parliament incorporates the proposal by its Committee on the Environment to link variable remuneration to climate transition plans.
On the downside, the final outcome falls short of ensuring a coherent, company-wide implementation of due diligence by requiring oversight by directors. This is crucial in order to prevent compliance departments from operating in a silo. Not requiring the involvement of directors is a key shortcoming of the plenary outcome, including relative to the Commission proposal, which was already only a first step towards clarifying directors’ duties.
By adopting a negotiating position for the European Parliament, the vote in Plenary today concludes the first stage of the legislative process, where the Parliament and the Council adopt their position relative to the initial proposal by the Commission. Now, the three institutions will enter into trilogues to agree on the final shape of the directive. Frank Bold calls on all institutions to prioritise the negotiations for the CSDDD in order to reach agreement on it before the end of the mandate.
Due diligence is a precondition for the sustainable activities as defined by the EU Taxonomy and green financing under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation, including green bonds. Particular ESG due diligence requirements will be regulated by the forthcoming Sustainable Corporate Governance Directive. To help companies better understand its scope and to clarify its requirements, Frank Bold is hosting a webinar. It will feature international experts from companies such as Ericsson and outdoor clothing manufacturer Vaude. We invite you to join us on 26 January at 10 am CET.
In mid-December, the European Commission acknowledged a large part of the arguments put forward by the Czechia in an effort to prevent the expansion and continuation of illegal mining at the Turów mine in Poland, that endangers the sources of drinking water for thousands of people in the Liberec region and, according to new studies, has serious impacts on groundwater in Germany as well. Frank Bold's lawyers, who defend the interests of Czech citizens, have long been involved in the case.
The Frank Bold Society and the Neighbourhood Association Uhelná called on the Czech government today to be more consistent in its negotiations with Poland over mining at the Turów brown coal mine. According to both organisations, the government did not have enough information or time to prepare an agreement that would truly protect Czech interests. Moreover, the government has acted in a non-transparent manner by failing to inform the public in advance of the terms of the agreement being prepared, which should lead to the withdrawal of the action against Poland at the EU Court of Justice. The organisations have therefore drawn up a document with seven basic demands on which the Czech side should insist.
