home
news

Progress in companies’ sustainability reports: evidence for policy-makers looking to change the legislation

share this article

Frank Bold’s research shows significant improvement in corporate disclosures largely due to the standardisation brought by the EU Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive. Companies are reporting ambitious climate targets and disclosing clearer, more comparable and meaningful sustainability information. 

EU policy-makers are negotiating drastic changes proposed by the EU Commission to water down these rules as part of the first Omnibus on Simplification. The sudden U-turn and rushed legal process risks undermining momentum among the business community. Weakening the EU laws would roll back the progress made on transparency, data quality, and long-term climate planning at a time when consistency and ambition are most critical.

Our analysis shows how companies are responding to EU sustainability legislation, revealing positive developments in the transparency and quality of disclosures while also highlighting some persisting challenges:

Climate change and GHG emissions

  • Ambitious climate targets have become standard business practice, with more and more companies committing to net-zero and aligning with EU goals. 
  • Thanks to the EU Sustainability Reporting Standards, climate transition plans are increasingly structured around decarbonisation levers, making disclosures clearer and more comparable. 
  • Forward-looking disclosures, such as planned investments and implementation challenges, are on the rise but still uneven. These insights are essential for demonstrating credible, future-ready climate strategies.
  • GHG reporting across all scopes is also established among businesses, with the ESRS driving better data quality and consistency. 

Double materiality and due diligence

  • The most effective disclosures are those that clearly reflect the company’s specific context—particularly its approach to the value chain and prioritisation. Companies disclosing less useful information tend to forgo specificity in favour of lengthy and generic process descriptions.
  • Strong disclosures link directly to due diligence processes, yet many companies offer vague references without showing how due diligence shapes materiality assessments.
  • The ESRS help companies balance broad strategic reporting with more detailed information on their impacts, risks, and opportunities. But most disclosures are still too vague—often missing how key issues affect people or the environment, or how this influences the company’s strategy and business model.
Access all preliminary findings

Our analysts reviewed and assessed the sustainability information disclosed by 50 influential companies from the financial, textile, energy, agrifood and beverages, pharmaceuticals, mining and transportation sectors.

The complete research will be released this September, alongside a compilation of best practices.

Businesses require clarity, certainty, and stability to invest in sustainability reporting systems that meet market and stakeholder demands. The proposed rollbacks threaten not only environmental progress but also the credibility of EU leadership in sustainable finance. To preserve the achievements of the past decade and foster a forward-looking and competitive business environment, policy-makers in the EU Parliament must reject measures that weaken the CSRD and CSDDD and instead reinforce their consistent, effective application.

If you have any questions about the preliminary findings, or would like to share inputs, please get in touch with Susanna Arus at susanna.arus@frankbold.org or Lorena Bisignano at lorena.bisignano@frankbold.org

    (
)

You may also like these news

Energy Communities Can Support the Grid. They Just Need Proper Setup, Experts Say

This spring, the European Commission's ETIP SNET platform released a study on the impact of energy communities on the grid. The analysis was followed up in August by the major pan-European CIGRE conference, where study authors discussed their findings with energy experts, including scientists and grid operators. They concluded that well-structured energy communities could benefit the grid if supported by the regulatory framework and other market participants.

Research: Are Businesses Embracing the ESRS and How Can Policymakers Avoid Creating Legal Uncertainty Around its Application

The study on the sustainability disclosures of 100 influential companies from high-impact sectors provides an early reflection on the general readiness for businesses in the EU to meet the expectations of the upcoming EU sustainability rules and standards. Our report contributes to identifying the main challenges, as well as to highlight emerging good practices.

Landmark Case: EU Environmental Law Used to Address Transboundary Pollution from Turów Mine

Thanks to legal support from the Frank Bold expert group, the Czech Neighborhood Association Uhelná, which has been opposing the adverse effects of mining at the Polish Turów mine, has achieved a significant milestone: at their initiative, the Czech Environmental Inspectorate (CEI) launched an investigation to assess whether mining activities at Turów are causing long-term water loss on the Czech side of the border. This is one of the first cases in which the Czech office has applied the Act on the Prevention of Ecological Damage. The Inspectorate has also included the Polish mining company PGE in the proceedings.