EU policy-makers agreed last night to postpone by two years the deadline for the adoption of sector-specific standards for companies sustainability reporting, which was initially set in the EU Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive for June 2024.
EFRAG - the technical advisory body preparing the EU draft standards - started working on sector-specific standards in 2022 but paused in Spring 2023 by direct request of the EU Commission to prioritise other work on the implementation of the first set of sector-agnostic EU standards.
Although we regretted this decision, we welcome that Members of the European Parliament and Council negotiators further precised the mandate for the EU Commission to adopt eight of the sustainability standards “as soon as each is ready”, or at the latest by 2026.
As outlined by NGOs, business and financial leaders as well as academics, the development and adoption of sector-specific standards is instrumental to make the reporting exercise easier for companies, while ensuring meaningful and comparable information for investors.
This year, companies will start to apply the first set of sector-agnostic standards, which cover general disclosures on strategy, governance and business model as well as reporting of environmental, social and human rights topics. However, there are important and complex issues such as decarbonisation, biodiversity or human rights issues in the value chain that were left to be clarified in the sector-specific standards, as concrete impacts and methods differ from sector to sector.
Instead of relieving companies, unduly delaying sectoral standards will only reduce clarity for companies to deliver on their reporting. This is particularly true for companies that have never performed a materiality assessment or that will start reporting sustainability information for the first time. EFRAG and the European Commission must heed the legal mandate and work to swiftly finalise and adopt the sector-specific standards that already count with advanced drafts covering 8 priority industries with high sustainability impacts.
The agreement among EU co-legislators needs to be formally voted by the Council and EU Parliament, but is expected to be in place before the EU elections this year.
Partners of the Alliance for Corporate Transparency remain committed to the development of EU Sustainability Reporting Standards, including via direct contribution and engagement in EFRAG technical work.
“Following the plan charted by the EU Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive, we’re glad to see EU policy-makers stressing the need to provide clarity for companies operating in industries with high impacts on our environment and society. EFRAG must reprioritise the work on sector-specific standards to ensure it delivers on time” - Susanna Arus, EU Public Affairs Manager, Frank Bold
“The Parliament and Council’s decision to adopt eight sector standards ‘as soon as ready’ by 2026 is bittersweet. While it acknowledges the urgency, the 2-year delay inevitably increases the reporting burden for companies, given the sector standards’ pivotal role in implementing the first set of ESRS. We must ensure EFRAG prioritises and promptly publishes these standards to maximise their impact.” - Mariana Lopez, Senior Programme Manager, ECOS
“The outsized contributions of certain sectors to global challenges including corruption, climate change, and the transition to a green economy mean that investors and citizens should not be made to wait for actionable sustainability data. EFRAG and the European Commission must embrace the mandate they have been given to adopt standards for high risk sectors–including oil and gas, and mining–as soon as each is ready.” - Robert Pitman, Senior Governance Officer, Natural Resource Governance Institute
For further information, please contact: susanna.arus@frankbold.org
Czech Supreme Administrative Court ruled today in favour better protection of human health from air pollution in Brno, a Czech city with 370 thousand inhabitants. The Court revoked the city's Air Quality Management Plan, issued in 2016 by the Czech Ministry of Environment. The reasoning of the ruling has not been made public yet, but the main argument against the plan was that it was not effective enough and would not lead to a swift achievement of the binding air quality standards. A similar ruling was issued in December 2017 with respect to Ostrava and in February 2018 regarding Prague and Usti region.
Czech Supreme Administrative Court ruled yesterday in favour better protection of human health from air pollution in Usti region on the northern border of the Czech Republic. The Court partially revoked the region's Air Quality Management Plan, issued in 2016 by the Czech Ministry of Environment.
Prague Municipal Court ruled today in favour better protection of human health from air pollution in the capital of the Czech Republic. The Court revoked most of Prague's Air Quality Management Plan, issued in 2016 by the Czech Ministry of Environment.
