home
news

Frank Bold's response to the ISSB future agenda priorities consultation

share this article

Last Friday, we submitted our recommendations to the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB)’s agenda priorities.

Frank Bold encouraged the ISSB to:

  • Focus in the first place on developing supporting materials for the implementation of the existing standards.
  • Bringing new research and standard-setting projects, to the extent that it entails expanding ISSB standards to matters beyond climate, should be prioritised next.
  • We welcome the proposed commitment towards prioritising "social related" disclosures (human capital and human rights) as well as biodiversity disclosures.
  • Social standards need to start with a cross-cutting thematic standard instead of working either separately or in parallel on "human capital" and "human rights" standards, in order to avoid contributing to a confused landscape regarding social issues.
  • Both for the development of a social standard and biodiversity disclosures, the ISSB should harness existing international instruments -in particular the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, the extensive implementation of social disclosures in the GRI, the UNEP Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, and the TNFD- and the experience gathered in the development of the European Standards in both areas by EFRAG.
  • Alignment with universally accepted principles and frameworks established by the abovementioned instruments is fundamental, with alternatives approaches leading to undesired further fragmentation in the area of sustainability reporting
Frank Bold's response to the ISSB
    (
191.9 KB
)

You may also like these news

The EU Commission's revised ESRS: a critical review of the changes and implications for corporate sustainability transparency and financial markets

The European Commission has published its draft Delegated Regulation revising the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS). The revision follows the Omnibus I Simplification Package and is presented as a burden-reduction measure. Some of it is - but a closer reading reveals a set of changes that go well beyond simplification, departing from EFRAG's technical advice and disregarding formal recommendations from the European Supervisory Authorities. Many of these changes have significant implications for the quality and comparability of sustainability data available to the market and public.

Frank Bold Launches Database of Good Sustainability Reporting Practices

By approaching sustainability strategically, companies can turn corporate reporting into a powerful tool to identify their exposure to climate and social risks in their value chains, future-proof the resilience of their business model and build trust with investors, customers and partners alike.

The EU Commission’s Proposed Changes to the SFDR – Our Analysis and Key Recommendations

The EU Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) is a cornerstone of the EU’s sustainable finance framework, but the Commission’s proposed amendments risk weakening comparability, ambition and product differentiation if key loopholes remain unaddressed.