By approaching sustainability strategically, companies can turn corporate reporting into a powerful tool to identify their exposure to climate and social risks in their value chains, future-proof the resilience of their business model and build trust with investors, customers and partners alike.
Yet many companies still struggle with a fundamental question: what does good reporting look like?
To help answer that, Frank Bold has launched a database of good and emerging practices in corporate sustainability disclosures. Predominantly based on 2025 reports, this is a living resource that will be continually updated with assessments of newly released sustainability reports.
In a European landscape shaped by the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) and the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS), the quality of disclosures is increasingly what sets leaders apart from those merely ticking boxes.
Drawing on companies’ annual reports, the database showcases examples from companies fairly presenting their sustainability impacts and risks. It is an interactive resource covering topics such as:
Users can filter by topic, country, and sector to find the examples most relevant to their context. Each entry is accompanied by expert commentary from Frank Bold's team, highlighting what makes the disclosure effective and where to find the specific information within the company's report.
Relevant and decision-useful information signals to the market that a company genuinely understands its risks and opportunities—and has a credible strategy to address them.
Whether you are preparing your first CSRD-aligned report or refining an established disclosure process, seeing how peers and industry leaders handle complex topics—from human rights impacts to climate risk assessments—can provide the concrete reference points that guidance documents alone cannot.
Access to the database is free.
Please note that the analysis focused on the quality of sustainability information disclosed by companies and does not constitute an evaluation of their performance or strategy. All claims regarding inconsistencies with information presented can be directed to Frank Bold.
The Frank Bold Society and the Neighbourhood Association Uhelná called on the Czech government today to be more consistent in its negotiations with Poland over mining at the Turów brown coal mine. According to both organisations, the government did not have enough information or time to prepare an agreement that would truly protect Czech interests. Moreover, the government has acted in a non-transparent manner by failing to inform the public in advance of the terms of the agreement being prepared, which should lead to the withdrawal of the action against Poland at the EU Court of Justice. The organisations have therefore drawn up a document with seven basic demands on which the Czech side should insist.
The European Commission recently introduced a draft of the revised EU ETS Directive which, among other things, proposes that 100 % of ETS revenues should be used for environmental measures. We welcome this idea but we’re also sceptical about how the ETS revenues are used in the Czech Republic. Therefore, we have prepared an analysis mapping the use of ETS revenues in Czech Republic and sent it to the European Commission as an input for the recent public consultation. The main conclusions are presented below.
We have analysed hundreds of pages of technical documents and prepared a comprehensive overview of the sustainability reporting requirements under the forthcoming EU legislation. We summarise what ESG data will be critical for companies, banks, and investors in sustainability strategy and management and in the areas of climate change, environment, sustainable activities, employees and supply chains, due diligence, and anti-corruption measures.
