home
news

Briefing: What Businesses and Investors Need to Know About the Omnibus 1 Value Chain Cap on Information Requests

share this article

A new legal briefing by Frank Bold unpacks the new restrictions on information requests to business suppliers following the Omnibus 1 revisions to the CSRD and CSDDD, and explains the practical implications for companies.

As part of the sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements under the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) and the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD), companies need to request sustainability-related information from their value chain partners.  

The Omnibus 1 Directive introduced restrictions on how and when such information requests can be made in order to protect suppliers from disproportionate requests. These consist of the value chain cap under the CSRD and the limits on information requests under the CSDDD. For companies in scope of these directives, it is important to understand the new restrictions.

Our legal briefing breaks down:

  • The scope and limitations of both caps, specifying what type of information requirements are legitimate  
  • The conditions on information requests, including the statutory right to refuse and how in-scope companies should interact with protected undertakings
  • The interplay between these two legislations
  • The practical implications for companies, as well as how companies can avoid unnecessary duplication  

The publication also points to legal uncertainties resulting from the European Commission’s proposed Voluntary Standard when it comes to due diligence scoping, GHG data and climate risk information and proposes practical steps for companies to preserve effective supply chain management while remaining fully compliant with the caps.

Who this legal guide is for:

  • Companies in scope of the CSRD and CSDDD who want to know how to legitimately request information from their value chain partners  
  • Business partners in the value chains who want to understand how they can handle information requests under the revised CSRD and CSDDD
  • Investors who want to understand what information they will have access to under the new post-Omnibus 1 sustainability reporting regime  

Download the guide

If you have any questions about the briefing, please get in contact with Senior Policy Officer Julia Otten at julia.otten@frankbold.org.

    (
)

You may also like these news

Prioritisation Under the CSDDD: A Compass, Not a Shortcut

Due diligence under the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD) is designed to direct finite corporate resources towards the issues that matter most for people and the environment. At the heart of that effort is prioritisation, defined in Article 9 of the Directive. Having spoken about this topic at the RBA conference this week, I want to share some reflections on what good prioritisation looks like in practice and what pitfalls to avoid.

5/12/2026

The European Parliament’s SFDR draft report moves sustainable finance closer to a credible climate transition — but major loopholes remain

The Parliament proposal shows that many of the concerns raised through Frank Bold’s research and engagement with policymakers are now entering the legislative mainstream. But the negotiations ahead will determine whether the final framework is capable of addressing the structural weaknesses that continue to undermine trust in the sustainable investment market.

The EU Commission's revised ESRS: a critical review of the changes and implications for corporate sustainability transparency and financial markets

The European Commission has published its draft Delegated Regulation revising the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS). The revision follows the Omnibus I Simplification Package and is presented as a burden-reduction measure. Some of it is - but a closer reading reveals a set of changes that go well beyond simplification, departing from EFRAG's technical advice and disregarding formal recommendations from the European Supervisory Authorities. Many of these changes have significant implications for the quality and comparability of sustainability data available to the market and public.